U.S. Grains Crop Year “Off to a Great Start”

Ryan LeGrand, president and CEO of the U.S. Grains Council (USGC), had an optimistic story to tell about U.S. grain exports at the October virtual meeting of Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City. The U.S. crop year for exports is off to a great start, he said, in no small part because China has made a real emergence in the market.  “China is likely to be our top customer for this crop year,” he noted numerous times, “and the trade relationship [between the U.S. and China] is surviving [despite the trade war and tariffs].”

Coincidently, on the day LeGrand spoke to the Ag Business Council, USDA was finalizing its weekly trade data for the week of October 9-15 that would show China was making large-scale purchases of U.S. soybeans and corn, as well as cotton and beef. In that seven day period USDA reported the U.S. had shipped 1.96 million tons of soybeans and 363,000 tons of corn. To accent China’s debut as a major grains trading partner with the U.S., LeGrand presented figures showing that for the crop year 2018/2019 China was not even among the top ten importers of American corn. This year, however, China will be number one.

Pitching his advocacy of foreign trade, LeGrand said, “Failing to move forward on trade means falling behind.” He noted that 97.7% of the world’s population lives outside the U.S. and more than 97% of the anticipated population growth over the next 35 years will take place outside of U.S. borders.  Also, he pointed out that agriculture contributes positively to the U.S balance of trade. “U.S. agricultural exports valued at $137.4 billion in 2016 produced an additional $172.1 billion in economic activity for a total of $306.8 billion of economic output,” he said, which supported 1.1 million full-time jobs including 764,000 in the non-farm sector.   Closer to home, LeGrand said the total value of the grain trade to the Kansas economy is $2.2 billion; and $974 million to the Missouri economy.

Founded in 1960, the U.S. Grains Council is a private non-profit corporation with ten international offices and programs in more than 50 countries. Its membership includes producer organizations and agribusinesses with a common interest in developing export markets.

Latest News & Updates in KC Agriculture - September 2020

Developments

Elanco closed its acquisition of Bayer Animal Health. The transaction is valued at $6.89 billion, funded by $5.17 billion in cash and 72.9 million shares of Elanco Animal Health common stock issued to Bayer AG, corresponding to 15.5% of the U.S. company’s outstanding stock, and which will be subject to certain retention periods until mid-2021.

Farms could contribute billions more dollars to the U.S. economy with the help of precision agriculture technology. But this can’t happen without more broadband, said presenters during a National Telecommunications and Information Administration webinar September 23, 2020. Entitled Smart Agriculture: Driving Innovation in Rural America,the webinar featured, among other speakers, Megan Nelson, an economic analyst with the American Farm Bureau Federation. She shared research showing that U.S. farms could generate $18 billion to $23 billion annually if they had high-speed connectivity and adopted the latest technologies.  More information is available at www.fb.org/market-intel. 

Researchers in Australia have found that younger consumers are extremely concerned about processed products. Nearly three-quarters (72%) of Generation Z – born between 1995 and 2015 – say they are not ready to try lab-grown meat, according to a new study published in Frontiers in Nutrition. Many of these consumers cited environmental impact as a concern. The research at the University of Sydney and Curtin University, surveyed 227 randomly selected Australian-based members of Gen Z on their dietary preferences, how they felt about cultured meat and their preferences for meat alternatives.

Chinese wheat purchases picked up steam in August, according to recent data released by USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service. China bought 250,800 metric tons of U.S. wheat in the fourth week of August, pushing the monthly total of purchases to 588,300 tons. China isn’t normally a major purchaser of hard red winter wheat, but COFCO, a state-owned importer has been buying hundreds of thousands of tons of it, according to U.S. Wheat Associates. Winter wheat accounts for 70 to 80% of total production in the US, with the largest amounts produced in Kansas (10.8 million tons) and North Dakota (9.8 million tons). The US hard red spring wheat crop is exported to over 70 countries each year to the extent of 55%.

Dairy Farmers of America has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. Key strategies to achieve the goal, says DFA, include mitigating methane emissions from cows by supporting advances in feed efficiency, herd nutrition and feed additives designed to reduce emissions; using renewable energy methods, such as solar panels and wind power, on our farms and in our plants; and utilizing anaerobic digesters, which convert manure and food waste to energy, on farms and in plants. 

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lenexa, Kansas, opened a new, 120,000 square-foot manufacturing facility in Lenexa where the company will produce viral transport media, the combination of buffering solution and plastic tubes that keep swab samples viable until they can be tested in the lab for the novel coronavirus. U.S. Senator Jerry Moran,Kansas Governor Laura Kelly and Lenexa Mayor Mike Boehm attended opening ceremonies August 28, 2020.

USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) announced grant investments of more than $53 million across three unique programs for U.S. farmers, ranchers, and military veterans to support American agriculture. “Agriculture offers promising career opportunities, particularly in farming and ranching,” said Parag Chitnis, acting NIFA director. “Federal investments in programs that help new farmers get into the business, support military veterans who are considering farming and ranching as a new career, and address serious stress-related mental health issues among farmers, are critical to ensuring our next generation of food producers are able to successfully meet the challenges facing agriculture.”

USDA-NIFA also announced $9.6 million awarded to 17 projects that will equip military veterans with skills, training, and experience for careers in food and agricultural and may also offer workforce readiness and employment prospects. Moreover, these investments will strengthen the personal finances of rural military veterans and military families and help grow their communities.

USDA reported last week that U.S. export sales of soybeans and corn for the 2020-21 marketing year are keeping up their rapid pace. USDA on Tuesday announced sales of 460,000 metric tons of corn and 530,000 metric tons of soybeans, much of it heading to China according to the USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service. Source: Agri-Pulse Communications.

People

USDA Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Steve Censky will be leaving USDA in November, returning to the American Soybean Association as CEO. Censky previously served in the same position for 21 years before coming to USDA. Part of his responsibilities managing the organization will be to work with the Board to finalize the plans for a permanent CEO, according to an ASA source. 

Private venture development organization TechAccel LLC, which invests in scientific breakthroughs to help solve global food crises, has named Brett Morris, CFA, vice president and director of investments.  He has been with TechAccel since 2016, most recently serving as principal, investment manager. In addition, TechAccel announced that Emily Aston, DVM, Ph.D., has joined their team as Science Advancement Manager. Aston has been working with TechAccel as a consultant since October 2019. In her new role, she will apply her veterinary and research expertise to science advancement in animal health and nutrition. 

The Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission announced Tom Waters, a Council member and past Dillingham Award Recipient as their new chair. John Briscoe is the new vice chair. Waters is a seventh-generation Missouri farmer and also serves as chairman of the Missouri Levee and Drainage District Association where he represents levee and drainage districts, businesses and others interested in the activities surrounding the Missouri River and its tributaries. Briscoe is a partner in the Briscoe and Brannon law firm with offices in New London and Hannibal. He served as the prosecuting attorney for Knox County in the late 1960s and as the prosecuting attorney for Ralls County in the 1970s. Briscoe grew up on a family farm that he continues to operate today.

The American Farm Bureau Federation and Missouri Farm Bureau presented U.S. Senator Roy Blunt with AFBF’s Golden Plow award. The Golden Plow is the highest honor the organization gives to sitting members of Congress. “Sen. Blunt is recognized well beyond Missouri as a strong advocate for farmers and ranchers,” AFBF President Duvall said. Throughout his tenure as a congressman and now as a senator, Blunt has demonstrated his commitment to agriculture in his leadership on issues such as improving flood control on the Missouri River, protecting farmers and ranchers from unnecessary regulation and securing river management priorities in the 2018 Water Resources Development Act, as well as his support for expanded trade. “Farm Bureau values the work he has done for our members across the country,” Duvall said.

USDA Deputy Undersecretary for Research, Education, and Economics, Dr. Scott Hutchins, announced that Dr. Spiro Stefanou will lead the Economic Research Service (ERS) as its new Administrator. Dr. Stefanou served as a Professor of Economics at the University of Florida’s Institute of Food and Agriculture for more than five years. He holds a Ph.D. in Agricultural Economics from the University of California, Davis, and an M.S. in Agricultural and Resource Economics from the University of Maryland, as well as a B.A. in Anthropology from George Washington University.

The Kansas Department of Agriculture and the State Conservation Commission have hired Andrew Lyon to serve as the executive director for the agency’s Division of Conservation. The KDA–DOC works to protect Kansas’ natural resources through the implementation of programs to support water conservation, water quality, land reclamation, and watershed management. Most recently, Lyon served in the watershed management section of the Bureau of Water for the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Lyon received dual Bachelor of Science degrees in agricultural technology management and in natural resource and environmental science from Kansas State University, and a Master of Science degree in environmental science from Oklahoma State University.

Kansas corn grower, Kylee Geffert traveled to Palmer, Nebraska to participate in an RFDTV Cattlemen to Cattlemen series episode consisting of two panels, both focusing on how beef and corn work together to create a sustainable food system. The episode was made possible by the NCGA sponsorship of the Cattlemen’s Education Series working to provide cutting edge information to beef producers that contributes to increased knowledge, profitability, and sustainability. Geffert was a member of a panel discussing how beef and corn work together to create a sustainable food system. The panel also included: Kevin Ross, NCGA President; Mike Drinnin, owner of Drinnin feed yards; and Dr. Galen Erickson, University of Nebraska Ruminant Nutritionist.

BNSF has named Kathryn Farmer president and CEO effective January 1, 2021. She will continue her role on and assume leadership of BNSF’s Board of Directors. Carl R. Ice, current president and CEO, will retire at the end of 2020 and remain on BNSF’s Board of Director. Farmer has been with BNSF for 28 years, most recently serving as executive vice president of operations since September 2018. Berkshire Hathaway chairman and CEO Warren Buffett said, “BNSF is an iconic company and this is a historic day. Carl has been critical to BNSF’s success for a very long time. I thank him for his leadership and his accomplishments. We look forward to Katie’s leadership and more success. She possesses all of the qualities that make us excited about the future.”

Events

Two sponsors will be honored with the Distinguished Service Citation during the National FFA Convention & Expo, which will be held virtually Oct. 27-29. Bayer and Meredith-Successful Farming magazine will receive the citation for their outstanding contributions to FFA and agricultural education on the national level. Bayer has been a sponsor of FFA since 1954 and has contributed more than $22 million to the organization. Meredith has been a loyal supporter of FFA for the past 75 years, both financially and by telling the FFA story through its media outlets. The organization has contributed $1.5 million toward FFA. 

The Missouri Pork Association notes the MU Annual Swine Institute will be held Thursday, November 8, 2020 at the Pork Place in Sedalia. Details will be forthcoming at www.mopork.com/event/mu-swine-institute/.

The 77th Annual NAFB Convention takes place virtually November 18-20, 2020. For more information on the 2020 NAFB Virtual Convention, go to www.nafb.com. 

Trade Tops Conversation at Ag Outlook Forum

DIGGING DEEPER…….

This year’s Ag Outlook Forum, presented by the Agricultural Business Council and Agri-Pulse Communications drew another record audience of almost 300 agricultural economy leaders from the region. Attendance was all the more remarkable considering that less than half were gathered at Kansas City Marriott Downtown with social distancing precautions in effect. The annual symposium was a virtual/hybrid meeting. Agri-Pulse founder and president Sara Wyant opened the forum noting the program was designed to offer insight on “what you can expect in an exceptional situation,” referring to the COVID-19 pandemic. Missouri’s U.S. Congressional Representative Emanuel Cleaver II welcomed the audience virtually from “the city of peace, love, congeniality and collegiality – otherwise known as Washington. D.C.,” sarcastically referring to the current divisive atmosphere of the Capital.

By Dennis McLaughlin, McLaughlin Writers LLC

Trade Tops Conversation at Ag Outlook Forum

Gregg Doud, chief agricultural negotiator at the Office of the United States Trade Representative, said it is feasible to think China could meet its Phase One trade commitment with the U.S. to purchase at least $36.5 billion in agricultural products by the end of the year. He pointed to China’s increasing agricultural imports – China imported $124 billion from the world in 2018 and $133 billion in 2019.  The country is on course to import $141 billion in 2020.  When looking at it from that vantage point, Doud said China's Phase One commitment to the U.S. (from $24 billion for the base year of 2017 to $36.5 billion [this year]), is possible.

Despite an absence of in-depth media and federal department updates regarding U.S.- China trade negotiations, progress is taking place.  Doud said his team and the Chinese “are talking.” He noted in the last three years 33 major ag negotiating sessions have taken place. He also pointed out that negotiations aren’t limited to volume, price and delivery concerns. There are structural processes that need to be agreed upon, like the number of U.S. facilities and enterprises, for example, that the Chinese would approve for exporting activity with China. Before the Phase One agreement, only 1,500 U.S. facilities were eligible. Now there are 3,500. Issues still being worked out pertain to the use of ractopamine and biotechnology.

Doud said structural changes actually are a significant advancement not discussed often. The original agreement called for 57 structural changes, and Doud estimates that China has completed 50 of those. Outstanding issues pertain to the use of ractopamine and biotechnology. Additionally, the parties have been addressing steps China needs to take to ensure greater protections or intellectual property rights, remove impediments to American companies in the areas of financial services and the elimination of forced technology transfer.

Even if China's purchase commitments are not met, the two countries will continue the dialogue and discussions. “China indicated they intend their very best to do this,” Doud said, adding, “It isn’t just rhetoric; they are making purchases.” 

Got Milk?

Gregg Doud also made note that ag products comprised the “biggest” lot of Phase One exports to China.  And dairy products are the “biggest” component of the ag sector. Former USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack concurred. Now president and CEO of the U.S. Dairy Export Council, Vilsack said his group and the dairy industry are encouraging China to buy more cheese and incorporate whey into national protein consumption programs.  Agri-Pulse’s Sara Wyant pointed out that the dairy industry was a leader in creating new food products.  To put down a bigger footprint in Asia, Vilsack mentioned the USDEC’s involvement in establishing a Center for Dairy Excellence in Singapore.

There are challenges for the dairy industry. Vilsack stated, “Canada has already begun implementing USMCA in a way that thwarts its market access promises and prevents U.S. dairy from making full use of the benefits that Congress and the Administration fought so hard to secure. There are also unanswered questions concerning how Mexico will translate its commitments to safeguard common-name cheeses into action. These are unresolved concerns that affect everyday dairy farmers and workers across our industry.”

Doud said he is watching the implementation of USMCA, particularly the situation with dairy in Canada. Another important focus will be the biotechnology situation with Mexico. Two key issues included in the USMCA deal are the biotechnology component and the enforcement mechanism. Doud said the new enforcement mechanism is something he believes the U.S. will really be able to “utilize in a fashion much more quickly than we had previously been able to use.” He added, “We will not hesitate to use enforcement tools we have in USMCA, if necessary.”

Other Trade Issues

Blake Hurst, president of Missouri Farm Bureau, introduced a panel discussion on trade issues saying, “With trade we always have issues.” He sees a change in Americans’ attitude toward trade, and thinks they may consider it not that important to the overall economy. He related a training and mentoring program with ten young, upcoming men and women managers working for several top tier agribusiness companies in Indiana.  After an all-day session, he said he was surprised that none of them brought up the role of trade in the ag industry.

Panel participant Jim Sutter, CEO, U.S. Soybean Export Council, described soybean producers as “brilliant at what they do no matter what nature throws at them.” He was talking about COVID-19 as well as weather and climate incidents. “The world relies on [the U.S.] for soybean supplies,” he explained. “We use 40% of our crop at home and export 60%.” And 60% of those export shipments go to China.

China is buying U.S. soybeans at a record pace, Sutter said, but the total this year won’t beat previous record levels, and Chinese commitments under the Phase One deal won’t be realized this year.  “As far as the actual trade goes, I think it’s unlikely that China will import half of the two-year commitment of the Phase One deal in the first year.” China committed to $80 billion of U.S. ag goods throughout 2020 and 2021.  Sutter predicted China would import 36 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans this calendar year, roughly the same amount as the country imported in 2016.

In 1995, the U.S. was a net importer of pork. “Today, we export 30% of our pork products,” said Bill Even, CEO, National Pork Board. U.S. pork exports support 110,000 jobs. He commented that the U.S. pork industry has effective reciprocal trade agreements around the world, and its production efficiencies make U.S. pork least expensive globally.  

Trending On The Farm 

USDA Deputy Secretary Steve Censky told the Ag Outlook audience that support for farmers is strong at high levels of all government agencies and departments. But he mentioned that the USDA considers another round of Market Facilitation Program payments unnecessary, in light of additional coronavirus relief for producers coming in the next couple of months.

The MFP was created in 2018 and repeated in 2019 to compensate farmers for losses due to China’s retaliatory tariffs and other trade barriers. “We have our exports that have been growing, and we expect to see those continue to grow, and we see no need” for more MFP payments, Censky told Agri-Pulse at the Kansas City forum. 

Federal Reserve Update

Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank president Esther George provided an optimistic assessment of the U.S. economy. But she had a cautionary message. The economy is working, she said. “The good news is the economic recovery is underway – quicker than I thought.” She credited the rebound to the general resiliency of the U.S. economy, the resolve of the American spirit and the fiscal stimulus programs. “The diversity of our economy has really come through,” said George. “Our economy is a microcosm of the thousands of industries in the country.”  But, she warned: “We’re not out of the woods yet.” 

Labor took a huge hit at the pandemic’s outset, losing 22 million jobs with lockdowns and shelter-in-place ordinances. George, however, pointed out that recent government statistics show that half of that furloughed demographic has returned to work, and the unemployment rate is 8.4%.   She also described a new perspective catching on at the Fed: Unemployment can drop lower than expected without “necessarily” causing inflation. 

George commented that the Fed has been proactive in addressing a bleak outlook for some community banks. The nation’s banking system is diverse with more than 10,000 banks, several thousand of which are categorized as small. “Policy makers must understand the dynamics of small banks.”  

Land Values

Interest rates are a prime determinant of farmland since the early 1900s, said Steve Bruere, president, Peoples Company. The relationship between interest rates and farmland is inverse in that an increase in interest rates should pressure farmland prices lower, and alternatively, a decrease in interest rates should support higher land values. The current interest rate environment is much more favorable than that of a year ago and should cause the farmland market to trend higher.  Bruere suggested there is a “huge demographic shift” in who is buying farm land, and outside capital is pouring in. “As farms get larger you need outside capital.”

Going Forward

USDA Chief Economist Rob Johansson told Agri-Pulse Communications, co-host of the Ag Outlook Forum, that the new round of coronavirus relief payments will help shore up farm income heading into 2021. He said about $6 billion in payments from the second round of the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program would reach farmers in the first part of 2021. Johansson forecasts higher revenue next year for livestock producers, but net farm income is expected to be down because of an overall decline in government payments. 

Highlights of Johansson’s presentation are shown below. Detailed data and stats are available at the USDA Office of the Chief Economist: www.usda.gov/oce.

Outlook for U.S. Agriculture

• Unprecedented shock to all economic sectors

• IMF forecasts continue be revised downward

• Agricultural commodities most closely linked to macroeconomic conditions have seen largest declines

• Net cash farm income and net farm income are forecast to increase in 2020.

• Net returns and government payments are forecast to increase, net crop insurance indemnities are anticipated to decline

• Debt-to-asset ratio remains low --- 13.95%, and debt financing cost falling despite total debt at historic levels

• Farm bankruptcy rates are slowly increasing

• Record production projected in 2020 --- slightly lower

• US beef production expected to slowdown in 2020 but pickup in 2021

American Farm Bureau Federation’s Chief Economist John Newton talked about the future of the farm safety net. The second round of the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program will provide additional much needed financial support for livestock producers, crop producers, specialty crops, as well as nursery, floriculture, specialty livestock, tobacco and several other commodity categories.

Some of the topics covered in his presentation are shown below. Detailed data and stats are available at www.fb.org/marketintel. 

Future of Farm Safety Nets

• 2014: Move Toward Payments That Are a Function of Crop Prices in ARC-CO and PLC

• Without Incentives: Cover Crop Acres Planted in 2020 Dropped to 2.3 Million Acres

• U.S. Farm Income and Expenses

• Can “Greening” Payments Make U.S. Agriculture Part of the Solution?

• Net Farm Income with and without  Federal Support

• What Won’t Work Long-Term: Set Aside Programs

Top Ag Negotiator Sets Sights On Africa, UK, EU

By Dennis McLaughlin, McLaughlin Writers LLC

In an upbeat presentation at the 2020 Ag Outlook Forum hosted by the Agricultural Business Council and Agri-Pulse Communications, Gregg Doud, chief agricultural negotiator at the Office of the United States Trade Representative, enthusiastically mapped out the way the U.S. will approach better trade agreements in key global markets. While his report focused largely on China (see Digging Deeper for full coverage of the Ag Outlook Forum program), his briefing on the trade opportunities with the EU, UK and Africa warrants a special report here.

Doud told attendees at the forum that the United States and the United Kingdom wrapped up the fourth round of trade talks this month. Another round is planned for mid-October. “I’m confident that we are going to get an opportunity to engage with them and work on such issues as tariffs, biotech and market opportunity. He noted tariffs on U.S. products will be high, close to 25%, when the UK leaves the European Union. But the U.K. imports $4.5 billion worth of beef, pork and poultry from the European Union. Doud reasons: “If we can get things right, I think we will have a fair shot at that, giving U.S. meat producers a new market.”

Doud is pessimistic about reaching a trade accord with the EU in the near future. “It is all the more difficult when you’re dealing with 18 or so Eurozone nations with special, national interests of their own,” he explained. But one of the biggest obstacles is the EU’s abandoning of bio and ag technology. Doud said the U.S. would make no apologies: “We’re going to use technology; it’s the way forward toward feeding nine billion people by 2050.”

Another bright spot on the U.S. foreign trade map is Africa. The U.S. has initiated negotiations with Kenya. “That’s our first entrée into the continent of Africa,” said Doud, adding that a successful deal with Kenya would send “a really strong signal with regards to the use of technology in agriculture.” That in turn could lead to deals with other African countries, many of which still follow in the footsteps of the EU, which openly distrusts biotechnology, Agri-Pulse reported. One key demand from the U.S., as it negotiates a free trade agreement with Kenya, is that the East African nation abolish its ban on most biotech crops. “Most farmers depend heavily on GMO seeds, and would like to see a success in Kenya spread throughout Africa,” said Doud.

Food Supply Chain Responds to Covid-19

KANSAS CITY, MO:  Food supply chain experts say there is no need for consumers to rush to the grocery store and stock up on items they think are disappearing from the shelves. Tom Brand, Executive Director, National Association of Farm Broadcasting, implied their fears are misplaced. “Demand is the issue, not supply,” he said as moderator of a webinar discussion on the food supply chain, presented by The Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City on April 16, 2020. 

The panel of food supply specialists included Nick Ebert, Vice President of Sales, Sysco, Kansas City; Dennis Rodenbaugh, Executive Vice President, Dairy Farmers of America; and Kevin Smith, Vice President, Sales & Marketing, Seaboard Foods. The economic fundamentals of production, inventory, transportation and liquidity are intact across all sectors of the food industry.  

DFA’s Rodenbaugh said the immediate goal of his organization amidst the Covid-19 pandemic was to create a strategy guaranteeing health and market security for its member dairy farmers, and opportunity as the country emerges from the crisis. Since the diary co-op was dubbed an essential business and would remain operational, Rodenbaugh explained that early in the crisis, DFA made the decision to have 1,200 of the 8500 employees work remotely. Farmers, truck drivers and other staffers were provided with PPE gear and sanitizers so they could carry on as safely as possible. “Unfortunately, cows can’t be turned off,” he rued, “and gallons of milk had to be dumped.” Going forward, DFA is implementing and devising as many tools as possible to stabilize the market.

Kevin Smith noted Seaboard had no real playbook for the pandemic or the havoc it raised on an hourly basis. But, Seaboard rapidly rolled out a plan focused first and foremost on the well-being of its employees, customers and “society in general.” The blueprint for survival called for curtailing unnecessary travel, customer visits and aligning its safety and business guidelines with CDC policies and recommendations.   Over the last 4 weeks, Seaboard has donated over 225,000 servings of pork products to a variety of charities.  This is approximately 30 percent of what the company had donated on an annual basis in recent years.

Despite the upheaval in its day-to-day business routine, Sysco is determined to remain a global leader in food service distribution, said Nick Ebert. He, too, reiterated that his company’s first priority “is the health and well-being of its associates and customers.”

Emerging Innovation

In detailing other steps they were taking to mitigate Covid-19 damage to the U.S. economy,  the panelists said their companies were making special appeals to grocery retailers and food service restaurants and drive-thru outlets.  Rodenbaugh said part of their outreach included an appeal to retailers to review “limited quantity” purchase policies – underscoring the idea that producers had product, and the issue was not supply but demand.

Rodenbaugh described a DFA campaign to encourage food service companies to increase use of dairy ingredients by an ounce to every burger, taco and sandwich and offer cheesier pizza  as a way to decrease dairy farmer raw product inventory and reduce dumping. Rodenbaugh stressed that dealing with retail grocers required a respectful approach in a stressful time. The key, he said, was “to let store managers make stocking decisions while encouraging them during this difficult time as they work to keep up with demand and manage their labor to accomplish that end.”  The supply is available, he emphasized.

As food service operations internal dining options were closed and allowed only to serve take-out or delivery fare, Sysco has worked with operators to establish or strengthen takeout/delivery platforms. From available packaging options focused on product integrity to online menus and menu consolation, Sysco has worked to ensure operators are best prepared to work in the new environment.  Sysco also is expanding its food service customer model to support more traditional retail grocer outlets among other market opportunities. 

The critical lesson from this Covid-19 pandemic, said Rodenbaugh,  “is as we move toward normalcy, we have to have planned  for other Covids, and be prepared to pay for them with liquidity, strong P & L’s and strengthened supply chains.” He added it is not easy to predict pandemic outbreaks, but the economy can be financially prepared using technology and applying what we’ve learned from this one. 

Agricultural Business Council to Honor Two Local Leaders

Diane Olson, Missouri Farm Bureau

Ralph Richardson, Kansas State University

The Awards Luncheon has been rescheduled to July 14 out of an abundance of caution with regards to COVID-19. We hope you can still join us!

KANSAS CITY, MO, March 2, 2020 - The Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City will honor two of the region’s leading agricultural figures on May 21 at a luncheon in the Chamber Board Room in Kansas City’s historic Union Station.  The honorees will receive the Council’s highest award, the Jay B. Dillingham Award for Agricultural Leadership and Excellence. 

Agricultural Business Council Chairman Greg Krissek notes the honorees are champions for agriculture in separate but very key areas in the region. The honorees are:

• Diane Olson – Missouri Farm Bureau. Olson recently retired as MOFB’s Sr. Director of Promotion and Education after a 34-year career there.  Regarded by colleagues as a “rockstar” in her profession, she is a native of Stone County in Southwest Missouri.  She learned the value of hard work and the importance of customer service in her family’s general store.  Following graduation from Reeds Spring High School, she earned her B.S. degree from Southwest Missouri State University (now Missouri State University). While working as a Child Development Specialist for the University of Missouri Extension Service, she earned her M.S. degree from the University of Missouri   She began her Farm Bureau career in November 1985 and has been a state and national leader in promoting agriculture in new and innovative ways ever since.  In 2005, she secured a federal grant to develop a series of extremely popular Agricultural WebQuest, an online agricultural learning activity for users anywhere in the world.  For 28 years she coordinated the Health and Safety exhibit at the Western Farm Show and she is a fixture at American Royal events each year.  She was a founding member of the Board of Directors of the Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City and makes annual visits to classrooms in the Kansas City metro area.  She coordinated Missouri’s Agriculture in the Classroom Program; served as president of the National Agriculture in the Classroom organization; hosted three National Agriculture in the Classroom Conferences, two of which were held in Kansas City; administered Missouri Farm Bureau’s (MOFB’s) education mini-grant and scholarship programs; and led the organization’s outreach efforts during the Missouri State Fair.  The ultimate professional, whether in a 2nd grade classroom, a teacher workshop or a Congressional briefing, Diane Olson’s leadership has made a difference and her dedication to agriculture made her a worthy recipient of the prestigious Jay B. Dillingham Award.         

• Ralph Richardson -  Kansas State University.  Dr. Ralph Richardson served as dean and CEO of the K-State Olathe campus for four years after serving as dean of the College of Veterinary Medicine at Kansas State University from 1998-2015.  He graduated from Kansas State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine in 1970 and served as a Captain in the United States Army Veterinary Corps for two years. He completed an Internship in Small Animal Medicine and Surgery at Purdue University and a Residency in Small Animal Internal Medicine at the University of Missouri-Columbia. After a year in private practice in Miami, FL, he returned to Purdue for 22 years.  At Kansas State University, Dr. Richardson was instrumental in establishing legislation that provided debt forgiveness to new veterinary graduates who serve the Kansas livestock industry.  He was a member of the inaugural Board of Directors of the Kansas City Animal Health Corridor, and he facilitated the creation of numerous programs at K-State such as the Beef Cattle Institute, the Center for Vector-borne Diseases, the expansion of the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, and the building of the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility.  Dr. Richardson received the animal health industry’s lifetime achievement award, the Iron Paw Award in 2015, and the Association of American Veterinary Medical College’s Recognition Lecture award in 2016.  Dr. Richardson has had a life-long commitment to agriculture, particularly the livestock industry.  He was active in 4-H and livestock showmanship from grade school through college.  Throughout his professional life he has championed the importance of safe food production, animal welfare, animal health, and public health.  

 “These individuals have had a positive and lasting effect on our community,” said Council Chairman Krissek. “They are strong examples of what being an advocate for agriculture can accomplish.”

The event will be held at the Chamber of Commerce Board Room in Union Station beginning at 11:30 a.m. for networking followed by lunch at noon. Visit www.agbizkc.com for more information and to register to attend. 

Cattle Disease Traceability is a Top Priority

The U.S. CattleTrace Initiative, established as a private, not-for-profit corporation in August 2018, is a disease traceability program with the goal of developing a national infrastructure for disease traceability and encouraging private industry to use it for individualized management practices. In January 2020, the CattleTrace board voted to formally change the name of the organization to U.S. CattleTrace, Inc. As the program expands and additional partners join the industry-led effort, the structure of U.S. CattleTrace will evolve to fit the needs of the program and be representative of the U.S. cattle industry. [Information was received from conversations with Matt Teagarden, CEO Kansas Livestock Association and Cassie Kniebel, Program Manager, U.S. CattleTrace by Dennis McLaughlin, McLaughlin Writers LLC, January 2020.]

Cattle Disease Traceability is a Top Priority

Animal disease traceability is not a novel idea in the U.S. Agreement on a need for a system to track and locate cattle susceptible or exposed to disease, is close to unanimous. And it’s been on the books – that is to say, in The Federal Register – since 2013, as a federal rule, Traceability For Livestock Moved Interstate rule (TLMI). TLMI established minimum national official identification and documentation requirements tracing and locating livestock moving interstate. Producers of dairy cattle and sexually intact beef cattle over the age of 18 months complied with the rule. 

But TLMI did not get much traction from the feeder-cattle sector of the of the U.S. cattle industry until 2018, when several state cattlemen’s organizations from major beef producing regions formed the CattleTrace Initiative. The goal was to develop a national infrastructure for disease traceability and to encourage private industry’s use of the infrastructure for individualized management practices.

Today, the U.S. cattle industry readily endorses a national end-to-end cattle disease traceability system, which provides critical tools to manage a disease outbreak and may provide opportunities to add value to the industry. Traceability would not be a value-added marketing measure per se at this point. “It would be more of a support system focused on disease traceability,” says Cassie Kniebel, program manager for Manhattan, Kansas-based U.S. CattleTrace, Inc. But the infrastructure could eventually lead to real valued-added components, she hints.

Need Is Real

At the recent Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City Ag Innovation Forum, Matt Teagarden, CEO, Kansas Livestock Association, stressed the benefits of end-to-end cattle disease traceability. He said it provides critical tools to manage a disease outbreak, and it could provide opportunities to add value to the industry. “A cattle disease traceability system is like a life insurance policy,” he said. “You want to have it, but would prefer not to use it. Using the disease traceability infrastructure to support inventory or animal health management systems could provide significant value to cattle producers.”

In an increasingly competitive global marketplace, national beef industry animal identification and traceability systems are the norm. And they could become a requirement for exporting beef around the world. But among the top 12 global beef exporters, according to World Perspectives, Inc. (WPI), the U.S. and India are the only countries without a nationally instituted traceability system in place. For the record, those dozen countries account for 95 percent global beef exports; and of that percentage approximately 65 percent of beef exports come from countries with nationally significant traceability systems in place or under development.

WPI, a Washington, D.C.-based agricultural market analysis and consulting firm, also noted that U.S. and India account for the majority of global beef exports that come from countries without nationally significant traceability systems in place. “This is not to say that U.S. product quality suffers compared to other top exporters,” said the authors of a WPI 2018 report, the Comprehensive Feasibility Study: U.S. Beef Cattle Identification and Traceability Systems. And they point out that it is “not fair to imply that the U.S. is at a competitive disadvantage on the export market without a system.”

Although U.S. beef is recognized as a global leader at all points along the beef value chain, without traceability such a system would indeed add value, as Kniebel and Teagarden suggest. WPI goes so far as to contend that without a national animal identification and traceability footprint, the U.S. beef industry could hamper its efforts to gain maximum value at all points on the chain. With a system, however, WPI argues American beef producers will accrue these benefits:

• Enhanced consumer confidence.

• A bigger marketing toolbox with which to compete for growing global protein demand around the world and to differentiate U.S. beef from others in existing markets.

• The ability to mitigate shock and better manage animal disease outbreaks.

For producers worried about privacy and keeping their data secure, both Teagarden and Kniebel, are quick to assure that the only information that would be scanned and logged in this traceability system is the date, time, location and ear tag number.

How It’s Shaped

In January, 2020, multiple state cattlemen’s organizations joined CattleTrace, Inc, a nonprofit coalition that included the Kansas Livestock Association and cattle groups from Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Oregon and Washington. Now called U.S. CattleTrace, this new initiative integrated traceability pilot projects in Florida and Texas – such as those run by Florida Cattlemen’s Association, Texas Cattle Feeders Association, Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association and Kentucky Cattlemen’s Association. 

Kansas Livestock’s Teagarden said “KLA is fortunate to be part of U.S. CattleTrace.” Putting traceability infrastructure in place nationally, he said, is an opportunity to share information along a broader stretch of the supply chain. “It will let us [U.S. beef] get better connected with consumers, who are becoming more aware of meat quality and safety.” 

U.S. CattleTrace’s goal is to develop a national infrastructure for disease traceability and encourage private industry’s use of the infrastructure for individualized management practices. “Cattle disease traceability is a top priority in the beef cattle industry, and this partnership will continue to help guide the development of an enhanced traceability system in the United States,” said Jim Lovell, past Texas Cattle Feeders Association chairman. “Our different state projects have always had a similar goal in mind – to develop a disease traceability system that works across the country. Combining our efforts makes this initiative stronger on a national level.”

How It’s Shaping Up

Leaders from each of the partner groups have agreed to establish guiding principles for U.S. CattleTrace, said program manager Cassie Kniebel, in a release announcing the formation and incorporation of the partnership in January. She noted her focus will be on these goals: 

• Developing electronic I.D. and electronic transfer of data capabilities to protect U.S. producers’ share of the protein market from the potential impact of a disease event. 

• Developing a voluntary national traceability system to include all cattle and complement the current USDA regulations. 

• Building a system that is recognized as nationally significant to all domestic and foreign markets. 

• Treating all industry segments equitably under management of a producer board of directors to ensure data privacy and protection. 

Kniebel stressed that the use of one technology for a U.S. cattle industry disease traceability system is the best strategy to maximize the value of technology investment. Since multiple RFID technologies are in use today, she noted, U.S. CattleTrace will accept data in a standardized electronic format. “But we hope to transition to ultra-high frequency technology by December 31, 2023.” 

Kniebel and Teagarden support and encourage proactive producer participation in U.S. CattleTrace, suggesting those who do will be at the forefront of this industry-driven initiative, and will emerge as influencers for the advancement of traceability systems in the future. The traceability platform system has the potential to add value to their operation across the board – from inventory, animal health and operations management to enhanced domestic and international trade. 

Ag Innovation Forum Addresses The “Why?”

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (February 24, 2020) – The question why came up in various forms during the Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City’s 2020 Ag Innovation Forum held in the KC Chamber of Commerce Board Room at Union Station. In his keynote remarks, Dr. Jim Carrington, president of St. Louis-based Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, suggested the science community needed to be explaining why it was researching something instead of describing what it was doing. A practical reason to focus on the why, he said, was that projects “don’t get vested without a Why.” Investors want to know why a platform, a chemistry, a robotic or such is being developed. Dr. Carrington also noted scientists need to keep an eye on the prize: That science should forge economic engines.    

The Forum’s closing keynoter, Dr. Michael Helmsetter, president and CEO of TechAccel in Kansas City had a different spin on the Why. He was asking why the Kansas City ag and animal health industry didn’t have a bigger “stake in developing” the area’s ag science innovation, given all the existing talent, capabilities and infrastructure. “We’re the ag leader in the Midwest.” He said there is “a lot of investment capital in the ag space” but other regions are attracting a larger share. He pointed to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, perhaps influenced by the success of the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, that is funding ag-related projects in St. Louis.  “Money attracts money,” Dr. Helmsetter said, with the implication that the Kansas City region needs to step up.

As speakers and panel moderators commented on advances in ag tech, Dr. Dan Thomson, Jones Professor of Production Medicine and Epidemiology at Kansas State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine, offered insightful food for thought to the proceedings. “There are two groups that don’t care about science and food,” he stated, “the rich and the poor.” Why? Because, he explained, “The rich err to the side of safety because they can afford it and the poor just want to eat.” Poverty is determined by the price of food, he added.  “If we make snap decisions that increase the cost of food production without increases in wages for people,” he went on, “we will increase poverty in our country – which not only increases food insecurity but decreases the value of SNAP coupons which decreases the value of taxes paid by American citizens.”    

Host and emcee for this year’s Ag Innovation Forum, Chelsea Good, vice president government and industry affairs and legal, Livestock Marketing Association, concluded the event with a question of her own. Wrapping up the proceedings, she cited the industry expertise of both the speakers and the audience. “As we leave the hall today, we’re energized and excited about the future of technology in agriculture,” Good said. “But are we solving problems, offering solutions to problems farmers don’t think they have?”    

This year’s Forum featured three panels: Academic – Promising Projects in the Pipeline; Entrepreneur –New Market Technology; and Using Data – Blockchain, Traceability, Precision Ag.

Promising Projects in the Pipeline

• The Academic Panel moderator Dr. Dan Thomson, said that sustainable farming processes face challenges from multiple agendas and advocacy groups. 

• Dr. Tom Spencer, animal science professor at the University of Missouri, talked about gene editing – specifically CRISPR gene editing for fitter, healthier and more productive food animals. Describing advances in gene editing, he said “Any type of modification that can be designed can be made. “ All phenotypes can be modified; natural alleles can be added; novel genes can be added. The holdup in advancing his science further, said Dr. Spencer, was governmental foot-dragging, i.e. which agencies would have oversight; what regulations would be implemented.

• Amy Hilske, director of the University of Nebraska’s Innovation Greenhouse, described her facility as a testing ground for optimizing yield and crop efficiencies.  “We are developing cheaper, more user friendly technologies to aid farmers and managers with their decision making process,” she said.  

• Dr. Justin Siegel, associate professor, University of California-Davis’ Genome Center, explained that advances in genetic technologies now allow everyone to read and write in the language of biology. “We can now communicate with the world we live in and build a better world. 

New Market Technology

• The Entrepreneur Panel moderator Kevin Lockett, partner and CFO of Fulcrum Global Capital, identified one of the challenges ag entrepreneurs and startups face is understanding how difficult it is to measure things in the field and aggregate the data. But technology can address most of that. Unfortunately, the wealth of ideas, innovations and platforms for new technology outnumber the opportunities for accessing capital.

• Dr. Brad Fabbri, chief science officer at TechAccel, explained how farmers face the added difficulty of “having only one shot a year at a successful crop or profitable herd. “As technology innovators, we can come up with the technology, but we have to know what the farmer wants.” TechAccel’s business model includes three key steps:  1) Identifying, licensing and investing in technology sources; 2) Continuing to advance the science and technology; 3) Deliver it for commercialization and monetization.

• Pete Nelson, executive director, AgLaunch Initiative, said ag needs to reach success markers at various development stages earlier than other industries because ag’s product is so important. “Food is important,” he stressed, “I look for future ag technology to be developed quicker.”

• Trish Cozart, program manager, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, in Golden, Colorado, talked about how NREL provides technology incubation programs that use the deep expertise at world class laboratories to push innovation forward.

Block Chain, Traceability, Precision Ag

• The Data Panel moderator Doug Dresslaer, director of cultural innovation, Dairy Farmers of America, launched a wide-ranging discussion when he asked panelists what is fueling precision ag’s growth. Where is it coming from?

• Andy Brudtkuhl, director of emerging technology, National Pork Board, said the “advanced, disruptive technology is coming in from Silicon Valley, as expected.” But while the platforms are effective, there are drawbacks and problems that are more attributable to cultural or community conditions than to technological/engineering shortcomings. What the Silicon Valley crowd didn’t grasp, is that that it is one thing to design a sensor, scanner or counter that can collect large amounts of data.  “But it’s another,” he quipped, “to use it accurately when pigs are rushing off trucks.” And another thing, he added, is not all farmers are as enamored with big data and are especially concerned about how well its protected.

• Orlando Saez, founder and CEO, Aker Technologies, warned that an emerging problem in the big data business is that there is no middle market for successful startups.  “If you’re good, you get bought.” Then the bigger companies tend toward complacency, hampering further technological advancement. 

• Matt Teagarden CEO, Kansas Livestock Association, outlined the U.S. cattle industry’s need for a national end-to-end cattle disease traceability system, which provides critical tools to manage a disease outbreak and may provide opportunities to add value to the industry.

Digging Deeper...

Farmers in more than a dozen states were kept from their fields this year, the wettest on record, well into fall.  According to the Army Corps of Engineers, most of the runoff came from tributaries without levees or dams, so there was no way to slow the surge and little time to warn farmers. “It just completely overwhelmed the levees downstream,” said Matthew Krajewski, chief of the readiness branch in the Corps’ Omaha District.  Be that as it may, the lack of emphasis on flood control over the past 20-plus years and the current inadequate infrastructure must be addressed as a national priority, says Tom Waters, a seventh-generation farmer, member of the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission, Chairman of the Missouri Levee & Drainage District Association and a speaker at Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City events. The crisis for farmers is compounded beyond the fact that they can’t get back on their fields to plant: Without proper, approved and completed levees, farmers crop insurance premiums for 2020 plantings could triple.  From an interview with Tom Waters about his testimony July 2019 before a hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Transportation  and Infrastructure by Dennis McLaughlin, McLaughlin Writers LLC, December 2019.

Missouri, Midwest Looks For Improved Flood Control

The media and insurance industries were calling last winter and spring’s floods in the Midwest an Act of God. But more sober assessors of the situation now are referring to these natural disasters – that caused more than $3 billion in damages and lost income – as acts of negligence. 

“Unfortunately, flooding events like this are becoming too common,” says Blake Hurst, president of the Missouri Farm Bureau and third generation farmer in Northwest Missouri. “We must address weaknesses in flood control structures and strengthen our ability to prevent flooding. The time has come to have a serious discussion about protecting our farms, rural communities and critical infrastructure,” he noted late last spring. 

That discussion is underway, with renewed urgency and seriousness.  Last May, U.S. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri introduced two pieces of legislation to address persistent issues farmers have encountered with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers related to flood control and damage mitigation. The first bill would ensure farmers are participants in any Corps decision-making that directly impacts their farms and communities. Sen. Hawley’s second bill is a companion piece to U.S. Representative Sam Graves’ House act that would make flood control the overarching and number one priority in the Corps’ Master Manual; it would remove fish and wildlife as an authorized purpose. U.S. Senator Roy Blunt is a co-sponsor.

Missouri lawmakers contend the Corps currently has eight goals in its Master Manual that are vie against with one another for attention and priority, creating confusion  when it comes to managing rivers. The objectives are not prioritized, and include flood control, navigation, water supply, water quality control, irrigation and recreation, fish and wildlife. 

These legislative  measures introduced last spring, unfortunately, appear to be moving through Congress about as fast as last spring’s deluge of floodwaters  are receding. Which is to say:  Not very.  Hurst commented that nothing moves in Washington; and made note of the situation that by mid-December waters in some area were only just now dipping below flood levels – nine months after the levees were breached and lands were swamped. 

Mission Changed

Tom Waters says a big part of the current flooding problem is a result of a federal omnibus mandate assigned to the Army Corps of Engineers in 1973 with passage of the Endangered Species Act. The Corps’ early mission was to build a network of flood control systems on the nation’s rivers

The Endangered Species Act required the Army Corps of Engineers to make major changes to its Master Water Control Manual, which some environmental groups saw as an opportunity to take over management of the river.  They pressed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to get involved.  “Three threatened and endangered species were identified and the power of the endangered species act would soon cause a dramatic shift in the way the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operated the system,” Waters says. 

Writing a piece specifically about the Missouri River last spring, Waters pointed out that in 1944, Corps engineers began shaping  the  lower river to provide navigable waterways to move products up and down the river. Flood control structures were designed to provide 300 feet wide, nine feet deep channels. “For decades the flood control and navigation system brought great economic benefits to the Missouri River Basin,” Waters wrote. “These two primary purposes also allowed for other benefits to develop such as water supply, hydropower, irrigation, water quality control and recreation, which includes fish and wild life.”

After passage of the Endangered Species Act, however, instead of using the highly engineered system for flood control and navigation as originally designed, Waters explains, the Corps of Engineers found itself dismantling the system piece by piece through increased dike notching and conducting experiments for the Fish and Wildlife Service. 

Make Flood Control The Priority

Tom Waters glibly describes The Flood of 2019, as “The Flood of 1973 - 2019.”  Dike notching began in 1973, he said, the first of many changes to the original river design.  In 2004, congress approved changes to the Corps’ Missouri River Master Water Control Manual which in effect defrocked it of its original and primary purpose of flood control. “Instead, the Corps is forced to try to balance all the purposes of the system to the determent of its ability to provide flood protection.”

Flood control was the original purpose for building the system back in 1944, Waters points out, and flood control is even more necessary today than it was then.  “The system has been modified to reduce flood control rather than improve flood control.  The tipping point has been reached and people have suffered enough. The key is for Congress to make flood control the priority.”

Easier Said Than Done

Making flood control the top priority for management of the Missouri River should be easy for Congress to do, Waters believes. His argument makes sense:  In the aftermath of flood after flood along the Missouri River, Congress continues to shell out millions of dollars for recovery – so wouldn’t it be wiser for Congress to spend money up front to prevent the damages in the first place?  “Improving infrastructure now can reduce or eliminate the expense of recovery later.”

Waters underscores Blake Hurst’s observation that things don’t get done quickly inside the Beltway. It will take the entire Congress fix flood control. In the affected region there are only four governors, eight senators and 19 congressional representatives, he notes.  “That doesn’t pull a lot of weight on Capitol Hill.”  He thinks local governors need to recruit at least 20 states to back real flood control initiatives and get some real traction in Congress. “The decline of our flood control infrastructure is not limited to the Missouri River,” say Waters.  “Flooding occurs nearly every day somewhere in the United States.”

Excerpts From Tom Waters’ Written Testimony Before A Hearing Of

THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

July 10, 2019

“WATER RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ACTS:

STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSING FUTURE NEEDS”

“The 2019, Missouri River Flood is not over. High flows on the Missouri River will continue well into summer as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers continues to release water from the mainstem reservoir system in the Upper Missouri River Basin.  In addition to the mainstem system, reservoirs in Kansas and in the Missouri Osage Basins have an over abundant supply of water, which will have to be released during the same time period.  These releases will combine to keep Missouri River flows above flood stage at most locations.  Any additional heavy rainfall will cause additional flooding.” 

“The, now infamous, “Bomb Cyclone” hitting Nebraska and South Dakota early this spring brought snow and heavy rain which overwhelmed the Missouri River flood control system.  The bomb cyclone was followed by a second round of heavy snow and rain later in the spring causing even more damage throughout the Missouri River Basin.  Levees have been overtopped, breached and eroded by the high-water event.  Communities have been inundated, homes and businesses lost and in rural areas, farmers have lost not only their homes, but also their 2018 crops stored in flooded bins, their machinery and their livestock.  Hopes for planting a crop this year have dwindled away as the river continues to scour across flooded fields.”

“Flooding in the Midwest impacts the entire country.  The Missouri Department of Transportation closed more than 470 different routes in 114 counties from April 29 to June 14.  Many remained closed today. Railroad tracks were washed out and train traffic was stopped and disrupted by delays and re-routing. Flooding hindered the movement of products through the states of Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska and Kansas with impacts across the entire nation.  Barge traffic on the Missouri River was also disrupted.”

“Flood control must be the number one priority for the management and operation of the Missouri River Reservoir System.  We have reached a tipping point and we can no longer continue to conduct failed experiment after failed experiment at the expense of people’s lives and livelihoods.  Missouri and Iowa farmland was not meant to be the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s laboratory and midwestern farmers no longer want to be their guinea pigs.”

“The long list of flooding locations serves to remind us the lack of attention to flood control infrastructure over the past several years is a national problem, which impacts nearly every corner of the country. Floods do not discriminate. They do not choose democrats over republicans or vice versa.  Floods don’t choose rich over poor, north over south or east over west. Flood control is not a partisan issue.  It is an issue impacting the entire country and as such, the entire Congress should support prioritizing flood control infrastructure as money for infrastructure projects is appropriated.”

 “In conclusion, this committee needs to remain aware of the ongoing flooding along the Missouri River.  The flood is not over and the people of the Midwest and the River itself will need your leadership, guidance and support to recover from this devastating disaster.

• “Flood control must be the number one priority for the operation and management of the Missouri River.  Using the system for fish and bird experiments has degraded the effectiveness of the flood control system and costs our country billions of dollars. 

• “There is a nationwide need for improvements to the country’s flood control infrastructure. Improvements need to start here and now with this committee and with Congress.  The failure to address the need for flood control infrastructure will lead to more flooding of greater magnitude and frequency. 

• “Without flood control transportation and commerce are interrupted, sewer and water supply are put at risk, and some of the nation’s best farmland is left out of production.  Without flood control people’s lives are put at risk and yes, people die. Simply put, without flood control, nothing else matters.

The full text of Tom Waters testimony along with graphs, charts and illustrations is available here.

Ag Business Group Elects Krissek as 2020 Leader

December 17, 2019, Kansas City, MO – Greg Krissek, CEO of the Kansas Corn Growers Association and Kansas Corn Commission, was elected Chairman of the Agricultural Business Council of Kansas City at the group’s annual meeting held December 12.  Lee Blank, Executive Chairman of GFG Ag Services, was elected Vice Chairman.  

Krissek, a native of Kansas City, Kansas, has over 30 years’ experience working with agriculture and ethanol sectors.  Prior to being named CEO of Kansas Corn in 2014, his previous stints included executive positions with Kansas Department of Agriculture, ICM, Inc., and Kennedy and Coe. He earned his law degree and MBA from the University of Denver.  He earned his Bachelor’s Degree from Rockhurst University in Kansas City.

The Council’s Board of Directors is composed of 20 persons who serve staggered two-year terms.  Those elected to the Board for terms commencing January 1, 2020 were: 

• Julie Abrahamzon, Cargill Animal Nutrition

• Tom Brand, National Association of Farm Broadcasting

• Chris Daubert, University of Missouri

• Nikki Hall, Corteva

• Terry Holdren, Kansas Farm Bureau

• Dustin Johansen, Osborn Barr

• Chris Klenklen, Missouri Dept. of Agriculture

• Kristie Larson, American Royal

• Paul Schadegg, Farmers National Company

• Stephanie Siders, CC Capital Advisers  

• Matt Teagarden, Kansas Livestock Association

Krissek extended his thanks to outgoing Chairman Bob Thompson with the Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner law firm who stepped down after serving two terms as Chairman.  Krissek also recognized several leaders who have played an influential role in the Council’s activities through the years.  Those include outgoing board members Ben Breazeale, Brad Garrison, JJ Jones, Jackie McClaskey, Diane Olson, and Kristen Parman.